{"id":121511,"date":"2023-12-13T21:29:04","date_gmt":"2023-12-13T21:29:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogcamlodipine.com\/?p=121511"},"modified":"2023-12-13T21:29:04","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T21:29:04","slug":"covid-inquiry-keeping-secrets-as-patrick-vallances-pandemic-diary-under-wraps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogcamlodipine.com\/politics\/covid-inquiry-keeping-secrets-as-patrick-vallances-pandemic-diary-under-wraps\/","title":{"rendered":"Covid inquiry ‘keeping secrets’ as Patrick Vallance’s pandemic diary under-wraps"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
The Covid inquiry has been accused of keeping secrets after its chief ruled it won’t publish the complete contents of Sir Patrick Vallance’s pandemic diaries.<\/p>\n
A copy of the former chief scientific officer’s personal notes was shared with the inquiry, and extracts have been frequently used during testimony and questioning.<\/p>\n
The entries shed light on a “chaotic” atmosphere at Number 10 and Boris Johnson’s “bipolar” decision-making, making headlines when Sir Patrick, his colleagues and the former PM testified last week.<\/p>\n
Lawyers representing the scientist have argued that the notes – written every night during the pandemic – should not be released in their complete form, as they would infringe on his human rights.<\/p>\n
The decision has not gone down well with members of the public, some of whom have said they “don’t see the logic”.<\/p>\n
READ MORE: <\/strong> PM: Eat out to help out saved staff from devastating job losses<\/strong><\/p>\n Sir Patrick\u2019s legal team argued that officials should only publish words from his notes that were directly relevant to questioning and that going any further would breach his rights.<\/p>\n Inquiry chairman Baroness Heather Hallett has concurred and ruled today that no further extracts will be published.<\/p>\n She confirmed the move when asked by Hugo Keith KC, the inquiry counsel, whether she would keep the publication limited ahead of closing submissions for the inquiry’s second module on Wednesday, December 13.<\/p>\n Mr Keith said: \u201cYou will recall that during Module Two, during the oral hearing, you ruled on an interim basis that only individual extracts from the transcribed notes would be put up on the screen and thereby published.”<\/p>\n Don’t miss… <\/strong> \u201cOn December 7, you provisionally indicated to the core participants through an email\u2026that you were minded to adhere to the approach which you had adopted earlier in the hearing, which was that only the individual excerpts to which reference had been made would be published.<\/p>\n \u201cThat email was sent to the core participants and they were given the chance to make submissions in response to your provisional-minded decision, but no submissions have been received in response.”<\/p>\n Mr Keith asked whether he may request she “make that provisional finding final and published\u201d, to which Baroness Hallett replied: \u201cI do.\u201d<\/p>\n
Rishi Sunak gives evidence to Covid inquiry in most perilous week of premiership[VIDEO] <\/strong>
Sunak to face Covid inquiry after claims Eat Out to Help Out spread virus[INSIGHT] <\/strong>
Covid lockdown ‘poured petrol’ on the problems of Britain’s poorest[ANALYSIS] <\/strong><\/p>\n\n